Current trends underline the need for taking a new look at the problem of
Communist China in a changing world: the deepening of the Sino-Soviet
rift, the growing
triangulation of the Cold War, the new diffusion of power and authority
in the Communist world, progress in arms control counter-balanced by
evidence that a truculent China may soon enter the nuclear club, and
signs that Peiping baffled by the great leap backward and the enormity
of China's long-term economic problems is casting about for new
solutions which could involve dangers and/or opportunities for us.
In this situation there is a need to lay the foundation for a
longer-range China policy, for a better coverage of North Korea, North
Vietnam and Outer Mongolia, for closer attention to the world-wide
implications for US policy of the Sino-Soviet split and for new focus on
Subcontinent affairs as they affect China. This Bureau must share
responsibility for developing policy affecting Communist Asia and must
assume the main responsibility for carrying out these policies.
Although Mainland China, North Vietnam, North Korea and Outer Mongolia
comprise two-thirds of the land area of the Far East and have over
two-thirds of the population of the Far East, it is a fact that at
present there are only two officers in the Bureau of Far Eastern Affairs
who spend full time on Mainland Chinese affairs, working under an
officer in charge who devotes perhaps two-thirds of his time to Mainland
China. These three officers comprise a sub-section of the Office of East
Asian Affairs which is responsible for Japan, Korea, and Taiwan as well
as Mainland China. Obviously, the Office's overwhelming concern is with
operational problems affecting Korea, Taiwan and Japan, the first two of
which are major recipients of our aid with the largest armed forces in
free Asia while Japan is by far the most important nation of the free
Far East. The Office has little capacity left for Mainland China.
Besides this, there is no officer in the Bureau dealing full time with
North Vietnamese or North Korean affairs while Mongolia is almost
totally ignored.
We, therefore, believe it essential to make certain adjustments in the
structure of the Bureau to permit more adequate coverage and handling of
Asian Communist affairs. (We recognize that we should avoid creating any
public impression of change in our China policy, but we feel there may
be advantage in acknowledging efforts being made to follow more closely
Asian Bloc developments and implications for the US.)
* Source: Department of State, FE Files: Lot 65 D 6, ORG—Organization and
Administration. Limited Official Use. The source text is an
attachment to a memorandum of October 8 from Hilsman to Deputy Under Secretary
for Administration William O. Crockett proposing the establishment
of an Office of Asian Communist Affairs in the Bureau of Far Eastern
Affairs. Neither bears any drafting information.
1 Establishment of the office was
authorized in a November 14 memorandum from Assistant Secretary for
Administration Dwight J. Porter to Hilsman. Telegram 470 to Taipei, December 4,
informed the Embassy that the office had been established effective
November 27. (Both ibid., Central Files, ORG 8 FE)