No. 274.

Mr. Nelson to Mr. Fish

No. 328.]

Sir: The Mexican congress during its recent session failed to consummate, by appropriate legislation, the extension of the free zone, and adjourned on the 15th instant, leaving the tariff bill, of which the free zone forms a part, in an unfinished state.

In order to ascertain from an official source the present legal status of this question, on the 21st instant I addressed a note to the minister of the treasury, inquiring if the action of the congress at its recent session had resulted in the extension of the free zone, and if further legislation was not required before the extension could become a law, (A.)

[Page 609]

On the same day Mr. Romero replied that the congress of the union approved, in the session of the 5th of November, the fifty-third article of the tariff bill, which decrees the subsistence of the free zone and its extension to the northern frontier, and that in the session of the 7th of the same month, the proper committee withdrew the fifty fourth article of the bill, in order to present it in another form. It was not presented, however, during the remainder of the session, nor did congress finish the discussion of the tariff bill; consequently it remains pending for the next session; Mr. Romero further says that, although a portion of the bill was sanctioned by congress, as it was not finished, nor sent to the executive for promulgation, it cannot be enforced, even in regard to the portion sanctioned. For this reason, although the article relating to the extension of the free zone was approved by congress, it cannot be enforced until the remaining articles are approved and sent to the executive for promulgation. This cannot, in any case, be done until the next session, which will commence on the 1st day of April, 1871, (B.)

A new congress will be elected in June next, which, it is to be hoped, will exhibit a more judicious and enlightened policy upon this important subject, more in conformity with the wise statesmanship of the executive department of the government.

Your obedient servant,

THOMAS H. NELSON.

Inclosures.

A.—Mr. Nelson to Mr. Romero.

B.—Mr. Romero to Mr. Nelson.

C.—Translation of the same.

A.

Mr. Nelson to Mr. Romero

My Dear Sir: Please inform me what is the present legal status of the free zone. Did the action of the Mexican congress at its recent session result in the extension of the zone, and is not further legislation required before the extension becomes a law? An early answer will greatly oblige,

Very respectfully,

THOMAS H. NELSON.

C.

[Translation.]

Mr. Romero to Mr. Nelson.

My Esteemed Sir: I have just received your letter of this date, in which you ask me two questions in regard to the free zone.

I have the honor to state, in reply to these questions, that the congress of the union approved, in the session of the 5th of November last, the fifty-third article of the tariff bill, which decrees the subsistence of the free zone and its extension to the northern frontier, and that, in the session of the 7th of the same month, the proper committee withdrew the fifty-fourth article of the same bill, in order to present it in another form. It did not present it during the remainder of the session, nor did congress finish the discussion of the tariff bill, consequently it has remained pending for the next session. Although a portion of the bill was sanctioned by congress, as it was not finished, nor sent to the executive for promulgation, it cannot be enforced, even in regard to the portion sanctioned. For this reason, although one of the articles of the bill which relates [Page 610] to the free zone was approved by congress during its last session, this article can not be put in practice until the approval of the remaining articles and the sending of the whole tariff, or at least the part already voted, to the executive for its promulgation. This cannot be done, in any case, before the next session, which will commence on the 1st of April, 1871.

I am, &c.,

M. ROMERO.