No. 171.
Mr. Welsh to Mr. Evarts.

No. 50.]

Sir: Referring to your No. 28, of the 26th ultimo, I have the honor to inclose herewith copies of a correspondence between Lord Derby and myself regarding the refusal of the British consul at Tamatave, in the island of Madagascar, to entertain complaints of American citizens against British subjects.

I have, &c.,

JOHN WELSH.
[Inclosure 1 in No. 50.]

Mr. Welsh to Lord Derby.

My Lord: Mr. W. W. Robinson, the consul of the United States in Tamatave, in the island of Madagascar, has represented to the Department of State at Washington that Her Britannic Majesty’s consul at Tamatave refuses to entertain complaints of American citizens against British subjects. He adds that this refusal had either been directed or sanctioned by Her Majesty’s Government. This policy must necessarily conflict with the interests of citizens of the United States, as it compels them to acquiesce in any injuries which may be inflicted on them by British subjects. Although the number of Americans in that place is not great and their causes of complaint against British subjects must consequently be few, it is desirable that, when such grievances arise, there should be a remedy for them through Her Majesty’s consul.

I am therefore instructed to mention this subject to your lordship, and to express a hope that, unless strong reasons should exist for continuing the policy adverted to it [Page 258] may be revised and modified, so that United States citizens may have their complaints heard with a view to their redress.

Mr. Robinson says that he has never refused to listen to the complaints of British subjects and will continue this practice. This course on his part has hitherto been approved by the Department of State, and no change in that respect will for the present be adopted, in the hope that there may be a change in the disposition of the British consul on the subject.

I have, &c.,

JOHN WELSH.
[Inclosure 2 in No. 50.]

Lord Derby to Mr. Welsh.

Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 12th instant, in which you inform me that the United States consul at Tamatave has represented to the United States Government that Her Majesty’s consul at Tamatave refuses to entertain complaints of American citizens against British subjects, and you point out the inconvenience which is likely to arise from such a course.

In reply, I have the honor to observe that if, as I assume, the complaint of the United States consul refers to the refusal of Her Majesty’s consul to hear complaints of a civil nature brought by citizens of the United States against British subjects, the explanation seems to be that the jurisdiction of the British consul is founded on the treaty between Great Britain and Madagascar and Her Majesty’s order in council of the 4th of February, 1869, which was issued to carry the treaty into effect. Under that order in council Her Majesty’s consul can only hear complaints of a civil nature arising between British subjects, and that is in all probability the reason why he declined the exercise of jurisdiction in the case referred to.

Her Majesty’s Government, however, are prepared to consider the question whether the powers of the British consul can be supplemented with a view to meeting such cases, especially as I understand from your letter that the United States consul in Madagascar entertains civil suits brought against his nationals by British subjects.

I have, &c.,

DERBY.