740.00119EW1939/4–2945: Telegram

The Acting Secretary of State to the Ambassador in Italy ( Kirk )

755. Referring to President Roosevelt’s letter to Churchill at Yalta95 urging that the surrender terms be superseded, the British now propose concluding with Italy a “definitive” treaty which “would be final and would cover all questions appropriate to a peace settlement with Italy”. They are preparing for communication to us at an early date the provisions they wish to include. If we agree, they desire a statement of our desiderata in regard to the proposed treaty and suggestions for obtaining the views of the other allied governments and advising the Italian Government of our intentions.

A copy of the British note96 and Roosevelt letter follow by air pouch.

While sympathizing with the views expressed in your 1075, April 29 and previous, it seems impracticable to delay territorial settlements indefinitely. There is little possibility of obtaining U.S. military forces to help maintain order in disputed areas over an extended period or obtaining the consent of other great powers to postpone all territorial problems. The disadvantages to Italy of prolonged uncertainty over final dispositions would seem to be outweighed by the conclusion of a reasonable settlement in the near future. Even before the conclusion of a, treaty an improvement in Italy’s international position would be desirable, however, and we hope that some steps can be taken in that direction.

The Department meanwhile is preparing to draw up its views regarding a peace settlement with Italy. Any comments you may have will be welcome.

Grew
  1. Letter dated February 11, 1945, Conferences at Malta and Yalta, p. 963.
  2. See aide-mémoire dated April 25, p. 1003.