126. Telegram 3585 From the Embassy in Pakistan to the Department of State1 2

[Page 1]


  • Pakistan Internal Situation: Post-Constitution Assessment

Summary: Domestic scene has quieted with passage of constitution April 10. Retrospectively, Bhutto held all cards save one—Baluchistan votes—in year-long battle over constitution. United opposition evidently remains intact, but without a cause except for Bhutto’s leadership, probable Bhutto will readily win in leadership. Probably Bhutto will readily win in elections if held in near future. End summary

Bhutto’s achievement of political consensus in final vote on constitution April 10 was culmination of year-long poltical struggle. It was unequal struggle from beginning.
Ever since his assumption of power in Dec 1971, most Pakistanis—including many of his opponents—recognized Bhutto as only alternative to resumption by army of [Page 2] political leadership. Bhutto commanded overwhelming position in National Assembly and provincial assemblies of two largest provinces in country and enjoyed great perrsonal popularity in both regions. He controlled central government with its resources for repression and rewards. He repeatedly demonstrated greater skill in political manipulation of masses and individuals than his opponents. Representing government in power, he was also favored by national mood which has increasingly reflected desire to return in “normalcy”.
On other side, political opposition failed unite against perceived threat from Bhutto until final round, held differing objectives and priorities, and with exception of Baluch Sardars, Wali Khan and one or two others had little or no popular following. Its main liability in constitutional battle may have been its inability attract any support from masses in issue remote their daily lives. Embassy and constituent posts believe that many among educated classes who were interested in constitution generally disapproved of opposition tactics, especially opposition boycott of Assembly. They apparently felt that any reasonably democratic permanent constitution was preferable to imposed interim constitution, no constitution or continual political arguing.
Nonetheless opposition held one trump card: loyalty of all five constituent assembly representatives from Baluchistan. Prospect of constitution rejected by elected representatives from one of country’s four federating units evidently caused Bhutto much vexation and may have prompted greater concessions by government than it would have otherwise preferred. If Baluchistan was Bhutto’s Achilles heel, various bargaining positions taken opposition prior to its ultimate boycott of constituent assembly may have also induced Bhutto to weaken some of constttuttonal powers accorded executive in his original draft (particularly in those cases where appreciable number of PPP members evinced some latent sympathy for opposition stand).
Opposition’s United Democratic Front (UDF) has evidently survived constitution’s passage. It has held public meetings recently in Quetta and Peshawar where UDF leaders advanced such demands as lifting of emergency and immediate promulgation of constitution. While UDF will probably continue to attract sizeable crowds, believe what little steam UDF was able build up over constitution issue has dissipated. Only major issue remaining for UDF to challenge government is Bhutto’s leadership.
Although GOP—assuming, as many do, that it will call elections this year—will presumably refrain from announcing them until last minute, elections may become next major focus of domestic political scene. Peoples’ Party likely to enter election campaign in spirit of overkill which has characterized its political actions during past year. Even though Bhutto could reasonably expect to equal his 1970 election results without resort to undue pressure against opposition, behavior of his administration so far suggests any forthcoming elections are not likely to prove as fair as those conducted by Yahya in 1970 (which admittedly were unique in Pakistan’s short history).
Bhutto’s current position is enviable. He basks in popular satisfaction over passage of constitution. He has projected his flanks catering to religious leaders on political right. While his talk of revolution and foreign policy gambits (e.g. recognition North Vietnam and North Korea) assuaged left. He has disposed of NAP as potential national rival by branding its leaders secessionist. With government apparatus behind him and his personal popularity still strong, he should garner substantial majority in Punjab and sind in any elections held over next several months. Possibly more worrisome to Bhutto than opposition may be conflicts within his own party during election. Period as various factions and personalities seek to enhance their positions.
  1. Source: National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970–73, POL 15–1 PAK. Confidential. It was repeated to Kabul, Karachi, Lahore, New Delhi, and Tehran. The Embassy had reported on the ratification process in telegrams 2903, April 10 (Ibid.), 2993, April 12, (Ibid., Central Foreign Policy Files), and 3017, April 13, (Ibid., Central Files 1970–73, POL 15–5 PAK) all from Islamabad.
  2. The Embassy assessed Pakistan’s domestic political situation as more stable following its government’s passage of a new constitution on April 10.