No. 147.
Mr. Seward to Mr. Evarts.

No. 567.]

Sir: I had the honor to transmit to you on the 18th of November last, with my dispatch No. 505, the conclusions of the conference of foreign representatives, held in this city in the months of September, October, and November, in regard to certain questions affecting the administration of justice which had attracted their attention. Recurring to that dispatch and its inclosures, and more particularly to the joint note addressed by the representatives to the foreign office in regard to the mixed court at Shanghai, I have now to place before you the response which has been sent to us by the Yamên.

You will see that it is entirely courteous in tone and substance; that it states that the subject has been referred to the southern superintendent of trade for a report, and that a further letter will be addressed to us upon the receipt of his response.

As that officer will undoubtedly refer the matter to the officials at Shanghai, it may be some time before his report will be received.

I have, &c.,

GEORGE F. SEWARD.
[Page 215]
[Inclosure in No. 567.]

Prince Kung to the foreign representatives.

Prince Kung, chief secretary of state for foreign affairs, herewith makes a communication in reply:

Upon the 26th of November I had the honor to receive a note from your excellencies, placing before me certain considerations affecting the administration of justice at the port of Shanghai, which had enlisted your joint attention, &c., &c.

The ministers and myself have carefully considered what your excellencies have placed before us, and fully recognize your earnest desire to place the administration of justice between Chinese and foreigners upon a satisfactory basis.

The port of Shanghai having a mixed population of Chinese and foreigners, and the number of cases being very large, a set of rules was prepared by the superintendent of trade in 1868, considered and approved by this Yamên, and communicated to the several representatives for their action in the premises, with the distinct statement that the given deputy is a Chinese official and must be guided by Chinese law and usage.

Since these rules were put into operation there have been no cases of complaint by foreigners against Chinese which have not been speedily decided. The graver cases have from time to time been determined by the customs intendant, acting in conjunction with the consul concerned.

Having now received your excellency’s statement of the several changes desired in the court in question, I have to remark that, as the former ten rules of procedure were prepared by a former superintendent of trade, it will be necessary to transmit a copy of the statement of modifications proposed to the southern superintendent of trade for his consideration in view of present circumstances, and for a report from him. Thereafter this Yamên will give the subject further attention and address your excellency again.

It is much to be desired that the forms of procedure may conform to Chinese usages, and that the administration of law in mixed cases may be made more perfect. Thus the rules can be permanently enforced.

I am writing to the southern superintendent of trade, and upon receipt of his response shall address your excellency further.

His Excellency George F. Seward, &c., &c., &c.