846G.79693/6–3048

The Ambassador in China (Stuart) to the Secretary of State

No. 288

The Ambassador has the honor to enclose for the information of the Department of State a copy of a memorandum of conversation which took place on June 24, 1948 between Mr. Quentin Roosevelt of the China Aviation Corporation and Mr. Jarvis, the Civil Air Attaché, on the subject of United States air carrier movement of Shanghai–Hong Kong traffic. The Department will observe that Minister of Communications Yu Ta-wei informed Messrs. Roosevelt and Bond of Pan American Airways that he felt that China was “licked” on the Shanghai–Hong Kong question, and that China would likely not take any further action in the matter until the present agreement expired.

The Embassy would like to suggest that this memorandum not be discussed with Pan American Airways in order to insure that source will in future feel that such matters can be freely discussed with Embassy.

[Page 799]
[Enclosure]

Memorandum of Conversation, by the Civil Air Attaché in China (Jarvis)

Mr. Roosevelt during the course of a conversation on another matter, volunteered that he and Mr. Bond of Pan American Airways had called on Minister of Communications Yu Ta-wei, and during the course of their discussion with him, he mentioned the “Shanghai–Hong Kong consultation with the Americans.” According to Mr. Roosevelt, Minister Yui stated that, during the course of the discussions prior to the conclusion of the Sino-United States air agreement, an understanding had been reached between the Chinese negotiators and Col. Powell of the U. S. under which the U. S. agreed to refrain from the movement of Shanghai–Hong Kong traffic. Minister Yu informed Mr. Roosevelt that in the event he was responsible for any further treaty negotiations with the Americans, he intended to have a battery of one hundred lawyers available to check each word in the document.

Apparently Minister Yu then asked Messrs. Roosevelt and Bond whether there was a possibility that some arrangement could be made whereby, through an exchange of letters between carriers, Pan American Airways would voluntarily refrain from movement of traffic on this segment of its route. According to Mr. Roosevelt, he and Mr. Bond informed Minister Yu that the matter did not rest with Pan American, but was one which had to be discussed solely between the two Governments. Mr. Roosevelt indicated that he and Mr. Bond then informed Minister Yu that Pan American Airways was not actively promoting competition for CNAC on this route and had in fact positively refrained from such activity. Mr. Jarvis gathered the impression that Messrs. Eoosevelt and Bond left with Minister Yu the thought that PAA would voluntarily refrain from movement of this traffic if the U. S. Government would not intervene.

At this point, Mr. Roosevelt queried Mr. Jarvis as to the possible reaction of the U. S. Government in the event PAA suggested that it, by an exchange of letters, agree to refrain from the carriage of this traffic and at the same time pointed out the insignificant amount of traffic handled by PAA on this segment due to foreign exchange difficulties. Mr. Jarvis informed him that he was sure that the U. S. Government would not agree to such a suggestion; that the U. S. position vis-à-vis the Shanghai-Hong Kong question was firm. Mr. Jarvis went on to say that not only the rights of PAA were involved in this case, but also those of such other U. S. carriers as might be certificated to operate on this route.

[Page 800]

Mr. Roosevelt then mentioned that Minister Yu had informed him that he did not wish to put any pressure on the CNAC request to operate to Tokyo, nor did he wish Col. C. Y. Liu, of CNAC, to do so, as in the event he decided to take further action on the Shanghai–Hong Kong question, he did not wish the Americans to be in a position to point to the fact that CNAC had been permitted to go through Tokyo in justification U. S. operation into Hong Kong. Mr. Jarvis informed Mr. Roosevelt that no attempt had been made to “tie-up” Tokyo with the Shanghai–Hong Kong question, as the U. S. believed that the Shanghai–Hong Kong case would stand on its merits.

At the close of the discussion, Mr. Roosevelt said that Minister Yu stated that he felt China was “licked” on the Shanghai–Hong Kong question and that China would likely not take any further action on the matter until the present agreement expired.