1. The British Guiana Independence Conference concluded in London on 19
November 1965 by setting the date of 26 May 1966 for the independence of
what will be known as the state of Guyana. The conference also produced
agreement on a draft constitution for the new state and stipulations in
the conference record for consultations between the leaders of the two
parties in the coalition government. A number of compromises were worked
out between Premier Forbes
Burnham and Finance Minister Peter D'Aguiar which, hopefully, will ease some of the
strains between them. The conference did not, however, succeed in
bringing the two leaders much closer together; they remain basically
incompatible on both personal and political grounds and are united only
in mutual defense against the threat posed by Cheddi Jagan.
2. [5 lines of source text not declassified] It
was generally agreed that the basic division of the country along racial
lines would continue, that Jagan
and the PPP would continue to enjoy the
support of the vast majority of the Indian population and that this
would continue to pose a serious threat to the government of independent Guyana. [less than 1 line of source text not declassified]
informally indicated that the British Government was alert to the
possibility of racial violence breaking out following independence and
would continue to be sensitive to any developments which might bring
into question the good judgement of the British Government in granting
independence to a government led by a representative of a minority
racial grouping in the circumstances now prevailing in British
Guiana.
3. Apart from the conference, the British Government and Premier
Burnham made some progress
in negotiating other agreements, primarily with respect to the internal
security of the country. The British have agreed to maintain troops in
Guyana until the end of October 1966 and to train and provide a cadre
for the newly formed Guyana Defense Force. This force and the augmented
Guyana police forces are to be brought to a sufficient level of
capability to permit the withdrawal of British troops in October 1966.
The adequacy of this solution cannot be judged at this time.
1 Source:
Department of State, INR/IL
Historical Files, [file name not
declassified] Telegrams and Reports, 1965. Secret; Eyes
Only.
2 An unattributed memorandum, dated November 26, reported that [name not declassified] met with Burnham on November 20. Burnham said that the British had
rationalized the outcome of the Conference “to salve their own
consciences,” fully expecting that the constitutional safeguards
would inevitably lead to East Indian control by constitutional
methods, which he said was “not going to come about.” The report
highlighted not only Burnham's plans for West Indian immigration, but also
his idea “that under the new constitution absentee voting would be
permissible.” (Ibid.)
3 Printed from a copy that indicates
Helms signed the
original.