William L.Dayton, Esq., &c.
Mr. Chase to Mr. F. W. Seward
No. 21.]
Consulate General of the
United States, Tampico, May 10,
1864.
Sir: On the 27th ultimo I had the honor
to address a letter to you on the subject of two notes sent to
me by the French superior commandant of this place, with which I
enclosed copies of the said notes and copy of my reply to the
first. A press of business on this consulate, and the prompt
despatch of the British steamer’s mail, prevented me sending a
[Page 763]
full report and
the requisite translations, an omission which I now beg leave to
supply, with the following explanations and enclosures.
From the outset of the French intervention with this country I
have carefully pursued a strictly neutral course, and every
American citizen residing in this place has followed my advice
and example; and up to the present moment not one of them has
been accused of meddling in the political or military affairs of
the country. In the mean time I have firmly defended their just
rights, but invariably manifesting a conciliatory
disposition.
You will please perceive that in the first note of the French
commandant he demands the names of certain individuals who, he
alleges, entered this city on that day, (April 25,) and
endeavored to hold me responsible for their moral conduct. That
note was written in the French language, and not delivered to me
until twilight on the day of its date; and, notwithstanding the
unseasonable hour, I obtained a verbal translation, and sent my
reply to it in thirty minutes after its receipt; but my clerk,
not finding him in his office, went and returned with it three
consecutive times without finding him. At 9.30 p. m. I received
the second note, and, not knowing its contents, I again sent my
reply to the first.
The second note was so written as to leave me in doubt whether
the threat of imprisonment extended to me or not, and under that
doubt I called at an early hour on the commandant, and pointed
out the impropriety of his attempt to hold me responsible for
the conduct of any persons entering this place. He excused
himself on the plea of alarming reports there were in
circulation.
In this state of affairs Captain Taylor, of the United States
steamer Kanawha, happily arrived here, and, fearing that the
appearance of that vessel might excite some real alarm, I lost
no time in presenting that officer to the commandant, who
courteously reported the presence of his vessel.
On my return to my office, I had a careful perusal of the second
note, and ascertained that the threat of imprisonment was
actually made against me, and I felt much regret that I had paid
these visits.
The individuals who entered this city were those mentioned in my
reply to the commandant, all of whom were duly reported to the
captain of the port. Among the passengers there was only one
American citizen.
I did not think it proper to reply to the second note from the
commandant, but I expressed my astonishment at its contents to
the acting French consul at this port remarking at the same time
that no difficulty was pending between our respective
governments, and that it behooved the authorities not to provoke
any.
Shortly after that conversation the consul was sent to me with a
message from the commandant offering to retire his notes. In
reply, I stated that if the commandant felt any regret for his
conduct towards me, and was willing to offer an apology in
writing, I would take much satisfaction in forwarding it to my
government, as the affair was now too serious to be decided by
this consulate.
This offer was declined, and I now respectfully beg leave to
submit this plain statement of the case to you, believing that
you will consider it of sufficient importance to take measures
for obtaining redress for this unprovoked wrong and in security
for my future protection.
I have the honor to be, sir, with great esteem and respect, your
most obedient servant,
Frederick W.Seward, Esq., Assistant Secretary of State,
Washington.
[The two notes and reply referred to in the above despatch,
and which formed its accompaniments, are the same as those
enclosed in Mr. Chase’s despatch of the 27th of April last,
No. 18, published in despatch of the 23d of May, No. 557, to
Mr. Dayton.]