[Inclosure 1 in No. 472.]
Colonel Stewart to
Mr. Pratt.
British
Consulate-General,
Tabreez, June 28,
1890.
Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the
receipt of Your Excellency’s dispatches Nos. 3 and 4.
The witnesses summoned by me have all arrived except the woman Asli. She
refuses to come or give any evidence. I tried in the first instance to
persuade her to come through the missionaries, as I thought it would be
better that she should come with the missionary party and not be tutored
by the Persian authorities.
When I was at Salmas the woman Asli was a willing witness and made
statements to several people. As soon as I heard of her unwillingness to
come I summoned her through the Persian authorities and hope she may
soon arrive; but, as I have two good witnesses who can repeat her
statements, and I have a witness, Deacon Zeah, of Salmas, to whom Minas
while in prison at that place confessed that he had the night previous
to stabbing Mrs. Wright come to the house with a revolver for the
purpose of shooting both Mr. and Mrs. Wright, I think I can prove the
case sufficiently, even though I do not get the woman Asli’s evidence. I
shall, however, do my best to obtain it.
The witnesses for the prosecution arrived here on Wednesday, and I
applied for the court to reassemble the next day, but on that day the
agent for foreign affairs the Wakil-ul-Mulk was replaced by a new agent
for foreign affairs, appointed under orders from Teheran, the
Mustashar-ud-Douleh. The Persians, therefore, represented that it was
impossible under the circumstances of the change of foreign agents to
hold the court that day and asked for a delay of 2 days. Under the
circumstances, I consented, and the trial is to recommence to-day.
I send a list of the charges I have framed against the prisoner Minas,
and I have ample evidence to prove these charges. The witnesses I have
are Mr. Mechlin, who sewed up Mrs. Wright’s wounds; Dr. Shedd, to whom
Minas, when captured, confessed having stabbed Mrs. Wright; Dr. Samuel,
who attended Mrs. Wright; Theodore, brother of Mrs. Wright, and his
wife, who were in the house at the time of the assassination; the latter
was in the room and an eye-witness to the stabbing, also Deacon Zeah, of
Salmas, whose evidence I have mentioned above; he can also repeat the
confession made by the woman Asli to him. Minister Johanna, of Salmas,
to whom the woman Asli confessed that she had prevented the attempt to
shoot Mr. and Mrs. Wright the night previous to the stabbing; and,
finally, Dr. Mary Bradford, who was with Mrs. Wright at the time of her
death and can certify she died of her wounds, and that the death of the
male unborn child was, to all appearances, caused by the shock of
stabbing the mother.
I did not summon Mr. Wright, though I suggested it would be well if he
was able to come. He has not come, and I am rather glad he has not done
so, as he is much upset by his wife’s death, and his children are ill,
and it is difficult for him to leave them.
Besides this, as in Mohammedan law I understand it is not usual to allow
the plaintiff to give evidence, difficulties might have arisen on this
point. I could no doubt have overcome them, but I have very ample
evidence without him.
The witnesses all ask for payment of their traveling expenses from and
back to Ooroomeeyah and Salmas, as the case may be, and Dr. Samuel, who
is a medical practitioner unconnected with the mission at Ooroomeeyah,
asks for some reasonable compensation for his loss of practice whilst
away from that place.
Will you please authorize me to disburse these expenses?
I have, etc.,
C. E. Stewart,
Colonel, Her Majesty’s Consul-General,
Tabriz.
[Inclosure 2 in No. 472.]
Mr. Pratt to
Colonel Stewart.
Legation of the United States,
Teheran, July 5,
1890.
Sir: I am now in receipt of your dispatch of
the 28th ultimo, from which I note that you have received my Nos. 3 and
4 and that all the witnesses subpoenaed by you to testify for the
prosecution at the trial of the assassin Minas had arrived, except the
woman Asli, whom you had found it necessary to summon through the.
Persian authorities.
Under the circumstances, I agree with you that it was best not to insist
upon Mr. Wright’s appearing at the trial if his testimony could be
dispensed with.
The charges in the list which you inclose appear to fully cover the case,
besides having the advantage of being both concise and to the point.
I am, etc.,