Mr. Swenson to Mr. Hay.

No. 286.]

Sir: I beg to inclose herewith, for your information, copies of a letter from C. Ravn and of mine in reply, respecting the status of his citizenship.

I have, etc.,

Laurits S. Swenson.
[Inclosure 1.]

Mr. Ravn to Mr. Swenson.

Sir: I most respectfully beg of you to excuse the liberty taken in writing to you, but I should like your opinion in the following case:

I emigrated to the United States of America twenty years ago and five years after was duly naturalized as an American citizen. During my stay there I held the position of state inspector of immigration (New York State) and later as United States inspector of immigration, which place I held for eight years; but was removed during the last Cleveland Administration, as I had always been a loyal Republican.

As you learn from my address, I am at present in Denmark. Should I decide to remain here, am I still a United States citizen and will I always remain such provided I do not declare my intentions to become a Danish subject? I consulted a lawyer who said that inasmuch as I had been baptized and confirmed here I have not lost my rights as a Danish subject. My contention is, that when I became a United States citizen I swore allegiance to the States and forfeited thereby my Danish citizenship, which, I claim, I can not reobtain unless I remain here the same length of time required of bona fide foreigners. Should you be pleased to decide in this matter I shall feel it as a great esteem.

I beg, etc.,

C. Ravn.
[Inclosure 2.]

Mr. Swenson to Mr. Ravn.

Sir: I have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 12th instant, requesting me to enlighten you as to the status of your citizenship. It appears from your statement that you emigrated to the United States twenty years ago, where you were duly naturalized as an American citizen; and that you have returned to Denmark, the country of your nationality, and taken up your residence there.

You ask, “Should I decide to remain here, am I still a United States citizen; and will I always remain such, provided I do not declare my intention to become a Danish subject?”

[Page 378]

Further on you say: “My contention is, that when I became a United States citizen I swore allegiance to the States and forfeited thereby my Danish citizenship, which, I claim I can not reobtain unless I remain here the same length of time required of bona fide foreigners.”

In reply to your interrogatory, I beg to inform you that your removal from the United States and your taking up a permanent domicile in Denmark would be considered by the executive authorities of the former country as an act of expatriation; that is, you would be looked upon as having voluntarily surrendered your claim to American citizenship and, in consequence, to the protection of the United States Government.

If, on the other hand, your residence abroad is only temporary, and if it is your bona fide intention to return to the United States and continue your residence there permanently, your acquired citizenship would not be forfeited by your absence from the country of your adoption, even for a comparatively long period of years. You will thus see that the question of your American citizenship depends upon your intention regarding future domicile. No mode of expatriation is provided by the Constitution or the statutes of the United States; hence the question as to what constitutes such an act must be determined largely by the circumstances surrounding the case. It is not within the province of diplomatic representatives of the United States to pass upon the civil status of its inhabitants, except in so far as their duty to extend the protection of their Government to citizens of the country makes it necessary for them to determine who are to be considered citizens. Beyond this point the question is one for the judicial, not the executive, branch of the Government to settle. The executive officers, of course, aim to harmonize their decisions with those of the courts; hence it may reasonably be inferred from their opinions what the courts would hold in a given case.

With reference to your contention regarding the Danish laws on naturalization and expatriation, I beg to say that it is not pertinent for me to give an opinion on that subject.

Very respectfully,

Laurits S. Swenson.