File No. 5315/334–335.

Ambassador Reid to the Secretary of State.

No. 953.]

Sir: With reference to my dispatch No. 941, of the 15th instant, and previous correspondence on the subject of participation of American financiers in the Hankow-Szechuen Railway loan, I have the honor to inclose herewith a copy of a note from the foreign office, dated the 23d instant, in reply to mine of the 12th instant (a copy of which was sent to the department in my dispatch 941 mentioned above).1 The substance of the note of the 23d instant was cabled to the department on the same day.

I have, etc.,

Whitelaw Reid.

The Minister for Foreign Affairs to Ambassador Reid.

Your Excellency: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 12th instant on the subject of the proposed participation of American financiers in the Hankow-Szechuen Railway loan.

I entirely agree with all that your excellency says as regards the danger that would arise in China from the pursuit of conflicting interests and the consequent disagreements among western nations.

As I had the honor to explain verbally to your excellency, I also concur entirely in your view that, as a doctrine of international law, one of two joint concessionaires has no power to fix the term when the right of the other to its share in a concession should lapse through nonuser. I suggest, however, to your excellency that in certain matters of business that do not admit of indefinite delay circumstances arise which justify, and indeed compel, one party to a bargain to assume that the other party no longer desires to adhere to the arrangement if the latter party, after reasonable notice, gives no indication of its wishes. In the present case several years’ notice was given, and it was not until the negotiations between China and the European groups concerned had been proceeding quite openly for many months and had, subject to imperial sanction, reached a successful issue that any claim to participation was put forward on behalf of American financiers.

[Page 168]

The agreement which has been reached between British, French, and German financial groups and the Chinese Government is to the following effect:

A loan of £5,500,000 is to be raised by the three groups in equal shares for the construction of railways in Hupeh and Hunan.

The portion of the Hankow-Canton Railway which lay in these Provinces is to be constructed by a British chief engineer.

About 500 miles of the Hankow-Szechuen Railway, including branches, all in Hupeh, is to be constructed by a German chief engineer, and the remainder of the lines in Hupeh by a French engineer.

It is further agreed between the three groups that endeavors should be made to secure an extension of the line to Ch’eng-tu, the capital of Szechuen, to be constructed partly by a French and partly by a British chief engineer in such a manner that of the whole line from Hankow to Ch’eng-tu about a third each should be intrusted to German, French, and Bhitish chief engineers.

I venture again to express the hope that the American group will place no difficulties in the way of securing imperial sanction for the agreement which has been reached.

As regards, however, the participation of American capital in financial loans in China, I have the honor to suggest that the American group should place themselves in communication with the British, French, and German syndicates concerned.

His Majesty’s Government entirely approve and welcome in principle the participation of American capital in Chinese railway loans, and they hope that an arrangement may yet be arrived at for an equal participation between the American and other foreign banks in the loan in question, leaving undisturbed the agreement concluded by the British, French, and German groups.

I have, etc.,

E. Grey.
  1. Not printed.