File No. 812.00/8211.

The American Chargé d’Affaires to the Secretary of State.

No. 2015.]

Sir: Referring to the Embassy’s despatch No. 2007 of July 15, 1913, I have the honor to transmit herewith a translation of the reply to the note addressed to the Subsecretary for Foreign Affairs regarding anti-American demonstrations in this capital.

I have [etc.]

Nelson O’Shaughnessy.
[Page 815]
[Inclosure—Translation.]

The Subsecretary for Foreign Affairs to the American Ambassador.

Mr. Ambassador: In note No. 6243, dated the 12th instant, your excellency states that you have noted [etc. to the end of the note].

It is a matter of much regret to me, as it is to your excellency to refer to the manifestations of ill will on the part of a certain group and of various journals of the capital against the Government of the United States; but I can not but call your excellency’s attention to the fact that such manifestations, in so far as the majority of the newspapers and the greater masses of the people are concerned, especially the youth of the schools and the working classes, are not directed against the American nation and much less against the Americans residing in this capital, which facts perhaps have not reached your excellency’s knowledge in all the extent of the truth, because of the natural excitement of your informants.

Your excellency states that the Americans who live in Mexico, whose supposed dangers have given rise to the representations I have the honor to reply to, are in perfect sympathy with the mass of the demonstrators. This very thing indicates to what extent their demonstrations will go, and I can without the least doubt assure your excellency that if the Americans have enjoyed in Mexico the fullest protection [sic], the same has not been the exclusive result of the vigilance of the Government, but also of the spirit of justice which moves the whole country, even at a time of excitement produced by the acts to which your excellency refers and which I am sure would not have caused the excitement of passions, such as we see, if certain representations had been attended to in time when made by the Government of Mexico in the most friendly way and with the desire to present before public opinion in this country the satisfactory results of its diplomatic action near the American Government in order to calm all kinds of animosity.

Your excellency may be sure, as there are many proofs in support of it, that the Mexican Government spontaneously will at all times prevent the overflowing of popular sentiment against the citizens or representatives of a friendly nation, whatever may be the diplomatic relations with the foreign Government to which they may belong, and your excellency may also feel certain that my Government will do nothing that will excite public opinion by giving out events which should remain a secret in the Chancelleries or by presenting others in an adulterated form.

I can not refrain from mentioning and examining the latest events, in order to make it completely clear as regards the reference made in your excellency’s note.

The case of the Mexican flag insulted in Tucson was not published by the Mexican Government but on the contrary the statements of the Department of Foreign Relations very eloquently show, the desire to appease public opinion, notwithstanding that it has been necessary, as your excellency knows, to resort to all the means of persuasion in order not fully to show the lack of an active and energetic desire on the part of the United States to satisfy the just demands of the Mexican Government.

With reference to the case of Consul Johnson I shall say only that the events having occurred about the middle of June and the details of the same having been published since then with regard to the attempt to have the military band held at Brownsville pass into the ranks of the rebels, as suggested by the above Consul, it has not been the Mexican Government which has published; the matter in the press and it is not to blame if its efforts have been without a satisfactory reply to this day. To withdraw the exequatur of the above Consul, though perfectly justifiable, would have meant to deprive the Government of the United States of the occasion it had to show its spirit of impartiality and its good will toward this country and it would have tended to exasperate the people.

In the case of the conduct of the Commander of the S. S. Pittsburg some representations have been made to the Government of the United States, not precisely with reference to the direction given to the rays of the searchlight at the time of the fight between Government and rebel forces, but in [Page 816] regard to certain maneuvering of a suspicious character which might not indicate complicity, but a sign of the sympathy which, according to evidence generally obtained by the Embassy, exists between American residents of Sonora and the rebels operating in that state. On the other hand, the acts executed by the Commander of the Pittsburg were so public that no official declaration was needed to have them become the property of the press.

As your excellency may see, the whole of this affair is not a matter of fictitious doings to excite public opinion, but of a status of deep excitement, the cause of which is well known to your excellency, which you implicitly recognize when you say that the impartial and just American colony resident of this city is in close sympathy with the views of the demonstrators to whom you refer.

It is not my intention to defend the press which maliciously tends to create disturbance, which it preserves by means of false reports and inflammatory statements; but if such were the theme of this note there is no doubt that the Mexican press would be the less guilty in view of the amount and intensity of the insults, slander and offenses of all kinds which, as your excellency knows, the press of the United States has been publishing during the past three years against men and groups of parties in my country and even against the whole nation, encouraged sometimes by the opinion of persons of political influence in the United States and on no few occasions by correspondents who live among us and who claim to be eye-witnesses of acts of their own invention or fancy, thus contributing to the torrent of misguided opinion of which your excellency has been one of the victims.

I will not make a comparison between the privileges and advantages enjoyed Mexican and American emigrants, as from such a comparison your excellency’s compatriots would surety not be at a disadvantage. Your excellency’s indications will always be carefully attended to, as in the past, without taking into consideration the equal treatment received by our nationals in the United States; because even though in many cases they may be treated differently on account of their origin or position, to do likewise would not be the means of remedying a deplorable condition, but rather of causing a lowering of the level of Mexico’s obligations to protect all foreigners residing within its territory.

I renew [etc.]

Carlos Pereyra.