723.2515/2380a: Telegram
The Secretary of State to the Ambassador in Chile (Collier)
98. Time for registration having expired and time for appeals expiring tomorrow, the Chileans are making demands to proceed with the election. Lassiter is insisting that he no longer has any excuse to hold matter up, and must make definite decision very soon. We have been examining the evidence in the case with greatest care and have employed Mr. Henry L. Stimson, of New York, a former Secretary of War, to examine the entire record and to give us his opinion from a wholly unbiased point of view. Next we are to have a conference with him, Mr. Dennis, and Mr. Hughes. From what we know of record, I agree with you that any unilateral election under existing conditions would be so tainted with fraud that for the Arbitrator to sustain it would be a scandal. I am very doubtful that General Lassiter, even were I to insist, would hold such an election, and I believe that he will insist on declaring whole plebiscite off in one way or another, and will hold Chile directly responsible.
I have no right to issue orders to Lassiter; but that is what I think he will do. It is my opinion that this outcome can be prevented only by the prompt decision of Chile to make some concession which will permit a settlement and to agree to suspension of plebiscite and withdrawal of costly delegations and personnel.
[Page 452]I regret what appears to be inevitable outcome: but I have gone as far as possible, consistent with honor of this Government and the duty to hold fair plebiscite under Arbitrator’s Award, in trying to protect both Chile and Peru from development of situation so disastrous to the real interests of both. I am unable to see how I can maintain status quo much longer, but I should be glad to have your suggestions.