840.48 Refugees/10–1245

The United States Political Adviser for Germany (Murphy) to the Director of the Office of European Affairs (Matthews)

Dear Doc: I have hesitated sending you the enclosed memorandum setting forth a point of view regarding the evacuation of the German population from the territory east of the Oder–Neisse line and from Czechoslovakia, for the reason that at Potsdam the American delegation did what it could to have the record show that while we agreed with the political decision, we insisted on its execution in an orderly and humane manner.

We here are not in a position to supply a complete picture of what has happened during the past months because we are unable to obtain an accurate account of what has happened from the Soviet and Polish authorities and we have not been able to send observers into the area for first-hand inquiry. However, scattered reports do come to us through OSS44 and other sources, and individual members of the staff in Berlin have opportunity to see a cross section of the refugees who arrive in Berlin, notwithstanding the stringent restrictions against the entry of additional German civilians into the Berlin area.

I pass this on to you for whatever it may be worth, simply because I am uncomfortable in the thought that somehow in the future we may be severely blamed for consenting to be party to an operation which we cannot ourselves control and which has caused and is causing such large scale human suffering. There is, of course, the risk that even mentioning the matter exposes one to the charge of “softness” to the Germans. In this, as in respect to one or two other phases of the situation, I am not so much concerned regarding what is happening to the German population as I am regarding our own standard of conduct, because I feel that if we are willing to compromise on certain principles in respect of the Germans or any other people, progressively it may become too easy for us to sacrifice those same principles in regard to our own people. There are some features of the American way of life which I know we would not want to see jettisoned.

Yours ever,

Bob
[Page 1290]
[Enclosure]

Memorandum by the United States Political Adviser for Germany (Murphy)

I shall set down for the Department my view of a situation concerning which I know our authorities are generally aware, but which I feel can only be fully understood in terms of the personal impression it has made on many Americans who are daily witnesses to the commonplace spectacle.

The constant flow of thousands of dispossessed German refugees from the Eastern areas continues. Trudging along the highways, carrying their odds and ends of small personal belongings on their backs or on small carts and perambulators, the vast bulk of them women, children, old people, in all states of fatigue, exhaustion, and disease—most of them the poor and small farmer elements—they present a pitiful sight. Most of them have been driven off the land and out of the towns of Germany east of the Oder-Neisse line. In the Lehrter Railroad station in Berlin alone our medical authorities state an average of ten have been dying daily from exhaustion, malnutrition and illness. In viewing the distress and despair of these wretches, in smelling the odor of their filthy condition, the mind reverts instantly to Dachau and Buchenwald. Here is retribution on a large scale, but practiced not on the Parteibonzen45 but on women and children, the poor, the infirm. The vast majority are women and children. Few able bodied German males in the age category from twenty to fifty years. This as the Department knows has been continuing for weeks and, while lessening, the end does not seem to be yet.

Alongside these unfortunates are the hundreds of thousands of invalided German prisoners of war recently released by the Soviet Union. (According to the official Soviet statement, 412,000 were released.) Tattered, mutilated, filthy wrecks of men, they straggle along the country highways and the streets of Berlin in an endless procession of misery, dregs of the Herrenvolk, hoping somewhere to find refuge with their families. If they survive the trek—for many die en route—they are often grievously disappointed in the end as the bombings and the battle have eliminated what was home for many of them.

But these are men, or the vestiges of men, and many of us have become callous to the suffering of soldiers in this war. Our psychology adjusts itself somehow to the idea that suffering is part of the soldiers contract—especially when he is an enemy whom we have tried our best to kill in quantity over many months. That psychology loses some [Page 1291] of its elasticity, however, in viewing the stupid tragedy now befalling thousands of innocent children, and women and old people. Knowledge that they are the victims of a harsh political decision carried out with the utmost ruthlessness and disregard for the humanities does not cushion the effect. The mind reverts to other recent mass deportations which horrified the world and brought upon the Nazis the odium which they so deserved. Those mass deportations engineered by the Nazis provided part of the moral basis on which we waged the war and which gave strength to our cause.

Now the situation is reversed. We find ourselves in the invidious position of being partners in this German enterprise and as partners inevitably sharing the responsibility. The United States does not control directly the Eastern Zone of Germany through which these helpless and bereft people march after eviction from their homes. The direct responsibility lies with the Provisional Polish Government and to a lesser extent with the Czech Government. Recent Polish and Czech suffering at the hands of the Germans undoubtedly renders them callous to German suffering. While the Soviet Union apparently has concurred in and supported the mass movement, as far as we know, the actual process of driving by physical means or economic pressures the people from their homes and firesides lies with the Poles and the Czechs. With this point of view I know Ambassador Lane does not agree. He has informed me of his opinion that this policy of deportation is Soviet dictated and controlled. That deportations have not gone further in the Sudetenland has been in part due to the presence of our forces whose Commanders, in friendly but firm fashion, have told the local Czechs that certain acts simply cannot be tolerated in the name of humanity, but even so, ruthless evictions have occurred on a sufficiently large scale to antagonize many of our troops against the liberated Czech people.

At Potsdam the three Governments agreed that the transfer of populations should be conducted in an orderly and humane manner, and that Poland and Czechoslovakia should be requested to suspend temporarily evictions of Germans. Despite official assurances, evidence seems to show that little regard has been paid to either point, especially to Poland. Ambassador Lane feels that Soviet Russia would be in a position to put an end to such evictions if it so desired, because he states the Soviets are in physical control of Poland. It should be said in behalf of Soviet troops that many instances of assistance to individual refugees, such as transportation on Army wagons, etc. are daily to be seen.

As helpless as the United States may be to arrest a cruel and inhuman process which is continuing, it would seem that our Government could and should make its attitude as expressed at Potsdam unmistakably clear. It would be most unfortunate were the record to indicate [Page 1292] that we are particeps to methods we have often condemned in other instances.

  1. Office of Strategic Services.
  2. Party bigwigs.