865.51/5–747

The Ambassador in Italy (Dunn) to the Secretary of State

secret
No. 677

Subject: Recommendations concerning Italian Economic Policies and Needs

Sir: In compliance with the Department’s telegram No. 583 of April 25, and with reference to my telegrams Nos. 1022 of May 2,1 1030 of [Page 898] May 3,2 and 1078 of May 7, I have the honor to submit as an attachment a memorandum which may prove helpful to the Department and perhaps to other Government agencies in evaluating current Italian economic and financial policies and in drawing conclusions as to the form and nature of possible long-range American collaboration in Italian reconstruction.

Dr. Henry Tasca, Treasury representative attached to the Embassy, is acting as courier in order to insure expeditious delivery and distribution of the enclosed material within the Department. Dr. Tasca, as the Department is aware, has been recalled to Washington for consultation by the Department’s telegraphic instructions of May 5.

Admittedly, conditions are serious, and the present government has not demonstrated its ability to rectify them. With special regard to my views on our policies until such time as an adequate government is installed, I respectfully refer the Department to my telegram No. 1078 of May 7.

Respectfully yours,

James Clement Dunn
[Enclosure—Extract]

Current Economic and Financial Policies of the Italian Government

1. General Appraisal

The current economic and financial position in Italy reflects the lack of confidence on the part of strategic economic groups in the ability of the Government to direct and control the country. There are four basic interrelated groups of factors accounting for the prevailing forces of financial and economic disintegration:

(1) Lack of inner consistency in the composition of the Government.

Since the days of liberation it has been necessary to include in the Italian Government, in varying degrees, representatives of political parties with such widely divergent concepts of social and economic reform that it has been difficult to prepare and execute consistent national plans for reconstruction and rehabilitation. In the field of finance, up until the present Government, the Ministry of the Treasury was in the hands of the Liberal[s]—that is, the spending side of the Government, [—] and the Ministry of Finance—the collecting side—was in the hands of the Communists, with both parties keenly endeavoring to outwit and outmaneuver the other with respect to financial policy. The Communists desired politically spectacular measures designed simultaneously to destroy the dominant property owners. [Page 899] The Liberals wished to preserve such classes as the backbone of economic reconstruction. IRI was headed by a Liberal but with left-wing Socialists and Communists in key positions immediately below. The former wished the dissolution of IRI, the latter the transformation of IRI into the central organ for State control of industry. Similar comments may be made with respect to other ministries and to the composition of the Government in general. These conflicts have made impossible the adoption of the sharply defined policies necessary to rehabilitate and reconstruct the Italian economy.

(2) Political agitation.

The electoral campaigns in Italy which have taken place, and those which are to take place during the current year, have had the effect of disintegrating such cohesive forces as existed in the Government which might have led to the adoption of viable financial and economic policies. The attempt to build up electoral strength has required a constant process of agitation. Promises, which augment discontent and social unrest, are made and the population is kept in turmoil. Such agitation has been a principal cause in the loss of confidence on the part of the people in their Government.

The agitation of the Communist Party deserves particular attention. It is now a well-known tactic of the Communist Party to remain in the Government and at the same time, particularly through CGIL, to offer corrosive opposition to the Government. This tactic (a) provides the Communists with a cloak of respectability for the Party, and (b) permits them to infiltrate into key positions. Threats of general strikes have forced the Government to yield on wage policy and expenditures for public works. Sporadic but frequent public disturbances throughout the country frighten business enterprise and accentuate economic difficulties, which in turn provide a tool for the Communists to exert further pressure on the Government publicly and thus seek to obtain further support from the masses.

(3) Lack of public order.

The incidents which occurred during the course of one week in Rome and Messina, which in one case involved jostling of and threats to the Minister of Foreign Affairs and in the other case the refusal of a group in Sicily to permit the Prime Minister to speak, could not fail to lower further the prestige of the Government. It has not been possible for a long time in certain zones of Italy for the Government to make effective freedom of speech, as is shown by the inability of a right-wing Socialist leader to speak in the red zone of Emilia. The loss of prestige of the Government incites holders of liquid assets, business enterprisers and people in general to attempt to provide individual economic security [Page 900] and gain in the form of commodity hoarding, speculation, capital flight, etc. This in turn accentuates the gravity of the economic situation. The lack of public order permits extremist elements to disturb public opinion by building up a psychosis of fear which is, in turn, politically exploited. The fear of Communist seizure of power, paradoxically, increases the number of adherents to the Party.

(4) Technical incompetency.

The loss of confidence of the strategic groups in the economic system is undoubtedly also to be attributed in part to repeated examples of gross incompetency demonstrated at the ministerial level. To a lesser degree this is also attributable to epuration of top civil servants. For many months the public was kept under the threat of fiscal currency conversion, a threat which finally succeeded in causing holders of currency to dishoard and to lose confidence in the future of the paper lira.

The threat of currency conversion was publicly made over the radio day and night to force subscription to the Reconstruction Loan, with the argument that currency holdings would be taxed as a part of the capital levy program in the process of preparation. The effect of such threats was to emphasize the instability of the lira and to decrease the desire of people to subscribe to the Loan. The interest rate on the Loan, in addition, was low relative to the prevailing interest rate structure. The net result was that the Loan was a failure, and attempts to hedge against the anticipated inflation multiplied to dangerous proportions.

Since currency conversion was supposed to form part of the capital levy, and since those subscribing to the Reconstruction Loan would not, to that extent, be subject to the capital levy, the final decision to abandon currency conversion penalized severely persons who had dishoarded currency to purchase Reconstruction Loan bonds. When the quotations on the stock exchange of the Reconstruction Loan fell to below 80, then the Government stepped in again and raised the interest rate on such securities held by persons who would not be subject to the capital levy. The net effect of the entire operation on the public was to demonstrate an astonishing degree of incompetence.

Another example of incompetency, with a political flavor, was the manner in which extraordinary financing was placed in the forefront, particularly by the Communist Minister of Finance,3 as the solution of the problem of budgetary deficits. Various types of extraordinary revenue-creating measures were announced and adopted, providing the public with the sensation that such measures would yield sufficient revenue to cover the budgetary deficit. The most recent of these measures [Page 901] has been the adoption of the capital levy, which in its present form will take very many months, if not years, before any substantial flow of revenue can be realized. The declaration of holdings, the examination of such declarations on the part of the appropriate governmental authorities, the assessment of the levy, the possibility of appeals on the part of the tax-payers, as well as the very large number of persons involved in view of the low gross value of 3 million lire subject to the tax, will all consume many months before any significant volume of revenue is collected. When such measures are adopted and the budgetary deficit position not only continues to remain serious but actually worsens, the psychological effect upon the people takes the form of a growing conviction that the most drastic technical measures are insufficient to “save the lira”.

A third example, on a smaller scale, has been the establishment by the present Minister of Treasury and Finance of a committee on credit control to study the ways and means of establishing effective credit controls in Italy. In view of the fact that this problem has been under study for many years and in view of the fact that under the 1936 banking act an effective system of credit control had been established, subsequently abandoned in 1944, the matter did not require study at this time. Informed business and financial circles can only believe that the Government is either incompetent or acting in bad faith.

In these circumstances the question arises, how much of Italian disorders and political instability are due to deliberate fomentation and unrest on the part of political elements and how much are due to economic difficulties and the relatively low standard of living. Indices of consumption and real wages would appear to indicate that the position with respect to the masses in Italy has not deteriorated substantially during the last year, and that in fact the probability is that the political agitation is retarding economic recovery rather than economic difficulties retarding the achievement of political stability and equilibrium. This view is of prime importance in connection with the problem of further external aid to Italy.

If it is true that the economic position could be substantially improved through political measures, then aid to Italy perhaps should be based upon the quid pro quo of necessary changes in political orientation and policies.

There are presented below a series of concrete recommendations regarding present financial and economic policies of the Italian Government. The recommendations indicate at the same time the defects in existing policies.

[Here follow: II. Recommendations on Tax Policy; III. Recommendations on Government Expenditures; IV. Improvement in Government [Page 902] System of Recording Government Expenditures and Income; V. Recommendations on Exchange Control; VI. Recommendations on Currency; VII. Recommendations on Credit Controls; VIII. Recommendations on Wage Policy; IX. Recommendations on Price Policy; X. Recommendations on Commodity Distribution; XI. Recommendations on Employment; XII. Recommendations on Foreign Trade.]

  1. Not printed.
  2. Not found in Department of State files.
  3. Mauro Scoccimarro, Italian Minister of Finance in the cabinet of Parri (June–December 1945), and in the first and second cabinets of De Gasperi (December 1945–January 1947).