768.00/8–1854

No. 700
Memorandum by the Chairman of the Operations Coordinating Board Working Group on Yugoslavia (Thurston) to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs (Elbrick)1

secret

Subject:

  • OCB Working Group recommendations for action vis-à-vis Yugoslavia.

Pursuant to urgent instructions of the OCB, the OCB Working Group on Yugoslavia has prepared the attached recommendations for action vis-à-vis Yugoslavia. A preliminary outline of a background study of this subject was circulated a short while ago.2 The Working Group, after making amendments to that outline in line with suggestions from the Department and from the other agencies concerned, decided that in view of the urgent nature of the OCB requirement it would be preferable to submit recommendations which it believes are self-supporting, without producing a formal background statement to be attached thereto.

The attached recommendations are the product of the OCB Working Group, and are being circulated at this time by the various members within their agencies for comment and/or approval. When comments have been received, in the present instance by the State Department member, the Working Group will compile a revised paper to incorporate the views of all the agencies involved which will then be submitted upward in the OCB organization.

It is requested that the addressees comments be communicated on an urgent basis to Mr. Nickels, who is assuming the Chairmanship of the OCB Working Group Yugoslavia.

[Page 1400]

[Attachment]

Paper Prepared by the Operations Coordinating Board Working Group on Yugoslavia3

secret

problem

To reaffirm and reinforce lagging Yugoslav confidence that the West (specifically the US) is dealing fairly with Yugoslavia/Tito, appreciates the actual and potential contribution Yugoslavia is making and can make to the attainment of those objectives we have in common and—within that frame of reference—is not discriminating against Yugoslavia because of our political differences, preconceived predilections for other nations, or a “colonial” approach derivative from Yugoslavia’s relative backwardness or dependence on the United States.

Recommendation

The following actions are believed feasible and their immediate implementation is recommended.

On the Part of the Department of Defense

1.
Initiate planning on an urgent basis, initially within the United States Government and later if found to be desirable together with the UK and France, for the early resumption of military planning talks with the Yugoslavs with regard to . . . .
A.
Once agreement in principle as to the scope and timing of the discussions with the Yugoslavs has been achieved so inform State, which will then inform the Yugoslavs in an appropriate manner that planning is actively going forward with reference to a resumption of talks.
2.
Plan a formal naval courtesy visit to an appropriate Yugoslav port at the earliest possible moment.
3.
Initiate planning for visits of high ranking US military personnel to Yugoslavia. Explore, in conjunction with developments vis-à-vis the Balkan Alliance, the possibility of a visit by General Gruenther in his NATO capacity on the pretext of exploring and developing the necessary relationship between the Balkan Alliance and NATO.
4.
Continue and further the current JCS study4 of the possibility of extending the Facilities Assistance Program to Yugoslavia.
[Page 1401]

On the Part of the Foreign Operations Administration

1.
Perfect plans for Mr. Stassen to visit Yugoslavia this fall (October now understood to be contemplated), and so inform the Yugoslavs at the earliest possible moment.
2.
More actively encourage, particularly with our allies as necessary and appropriate, Yugoslav participation in such European organizations as EPA and ultimately OEEC.
3.
As soon as administrative details permit, work out with the Yugoslavs procedure for Yugoslav participation under the ATDA Act to cover at least a three year period.
4.
Actively proceed with negotiations looking towards the high level economic conversations requested by the Yugoslavs, to be held preferably in Belgrade with the participation on the US side of an individual of both economic and political stature (should these discussions coincide with Mr. Stassen’s visit, consideration should be given to having him participate in at least some of the sessions).
6.
[sic] Develop, within present budget limitations, such long range programs as that currently being negotiated between FOA and the University of Kentucky for the exchanges of persons.

On the Part of the United States Information Agency

1.
Seek appropriate occasion to make public acknowledgment of Yugoslav contributions to our common objectives.
2.
Exploit, with due regard to other essential factors, occasions to emphasize the aggressive character of international communism and Yugoslav actions in opposition thereto.

On the Part of the Department of State

1.
Actively plan a visit by the Under Secretary of State, or by his Deputy, to Yugoslavia this fall in order to have an immediate impact on the current Yugoslav attitudes which we are endeavoring to correct, to allay the immediacy of Tito’s desire to visit the US, and to lay the necessary groundwork amongst American public opinion for an eventual visit by Marshal Tito to this country.
2.
Inform the Yugoslavs, as soon as the necessary clearance in principle has been obtained within this Government, that we are actively working on plans for the resumption of military conversations.
3.
Work closely with Defense in preparing, and later in arranging the terms of, the resumption of the military conversations, including exploration of the possibility of bringing Italy in at this juncture.
4.
Prepare, for transmission at the time the Trieste settlement is achieved and announced, messages from the President to Scelba and Tito capitalizing on the Trieste solution to encourage full cooperation between Yugoslavia and Italy in defense matters.
5.
Explore with AEC and such other Governmental authorities as may be involved, the possibility of including Yugoslavia amongst those nations to cooperate in the President’s proposed organization to exploit the peaceful uses of atomic energy.
6.
Include Belgrade in the Secretary’s itinerary on the next appropriate occasion.5
  1. Drafted by Marcy.
  2. This preliminary outline was circulated to the members of the OCB Working Group on Yugoslavia under cover of a memorandum of Aug. 5 from Thurston. A copy of the preliminary outline and Thurston’s memorandum were attached to a memorandum of Aug. 17 from Tyler to Thurston, in which Tyler commented on the preliminary outline and presented WE’s view that the outline may have gone a little far in implying that Yugoslav suspicion and dissatisfaction toward the United States was well-founded. (Italian Desk files, lot 58 D 357, “OCB 1954”)
  3. Drafted by Marcy.
  4. Not further identified.
  5. Regarding the possibility of Dulles visiting Belgrade, probably in December 1954, see Documents 241 ff.