151. Telegram From the Chargé in Saigon (Kidder) to the Department of State1
4908. 1. At Ely’s request, I went to see him late evening April 28 “to review events of the day.” I feel certain Ely’s request was based on conversation he had had earlier in evening with British Ambassador Stephenson, in which Stephenson urged Ely to do everything possible avoid recurrence of situation following events night March 29 when US and France found themselves taking firm opposing views as to responsibility origin of incident.
2. When I arrived at Ely’s residence accompanied by Embassy officer, I found Ely surrounded by Gambiez, Van Laethem,2 De Rougement and another staff officer. Ely asked Gambiez to give us full account available information as to origins of day’s conflict which was still going on as we sat there. Gambiez’ account was substantially similar to that reported (Embtel 4881 rptd Paris 1261.3) Emphasis was placed on fact mortar shells had landed “Y” Bridge area from unknown point of origin at approximately 12:15 and that shelling of Palace did not occur until one hour later. French briefing (SPD) morning April 29, however, made no mention 12:15 mortar shelling but stated mortar exchange began 13:15 at time attack on Palace.
[Page 316]3. French emphasized they had been scrupulously careful not attempt block actions National Army but had repeatedly urged cessation of hostilities.
4. Ely appeared deeply agitated over apparent continued determination Diem press conflict. Ely insisted Diem had violated truce by bringing reinforcements to Saigon, by removing Binh Xuyen Police Chief Lai Van Sang, and inferentially by responsibility for 12:15 mortar fire.
5. Ely inquired if I would be willing see Diem and urge him cease hostilities. I replied that I had personally witnessed from Embassy roof earlier in evening heavy exchanges of fire between Binh Xuyen and National Army, and that shells had been clearly visible flying in both directions. Ely seemed slightly surprised that Binh Xuyen were returning National Army fire. I pointed out we do not see matter in sharp black and white tones as French appear to do. I would see Diem April 29 in order learn further details his side of story but could give no commitment I would urge him cease fire.
- Source: Department of State, Central Files, 751G.00/4–2955. Confidential; Priority. Repeated for information to Paris.↩
- Gabriel Van Laethem, Counselor in the Cabinet of General Ely.↩
- See Document 143.↩