127. Memorandum From the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Brzezinski)1

MEMORANDUM FOR

  • The Secretary of State
  • The Secretary of Defense
  • The Secretary of the Treasury
  • The Secretary of Energy
  • The Director of Central Intelligence
  • The Director, Office of Management and Budget
  • Administrator, Federal Energy Administration
  • Chairman, Council of Economic Advisors

SUBJECT

  • Petroleum Supply Vulnerability Assessment

The President has directed that an assessment be made of the vulnerability of the United States to disruptions in world petroleum supply.2 This memorandum confirms the interagency effort underway to accomplish this task and establishes the terms of reference for the assessment.

The assessment should be focused on the period between now and 1985.

[Page 434]

The assessment will be submitted for consideration by the Special Coordination Committee.3 In accordance with the attached terms of reference (Tab A), the Departments of State and Defense will chair working groups composed of members from the interested agencies. The Department of State will submit its report to the National Security Council by September 2, 1977; the Department of Defense by September 9, 1977.

Zbigniew Brzezinski

Tab A

PETROLEUM SUPPLY VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Terms of Reference

Objectives

1. To identify and assess the vulnerability of the United States and its allies to petroleum supply interruptions and substantial price increases.

2. To identify the petroleum supply disruption and substantial price increase contingencies for which the United States should be prepared.

3. To identify and assess the policy options available to the United States to reduce its vulnerability to petroleum supply disruptions and substantial price increases and to cope with these contingencies should they occur.

Specific Issues to be Addressed

A. International Energy Analysis (Chaired by the Department of State)

—World petroleum market analysis by country to identify the range of supply and demand estimates and assess their validity with special emphasis on the dependence on foreign sources of the United States, the Soviet Union, and the advanced industrial economies.

—Analysis of the vulnerability of the world petroleum supply system to interdiction, including acts of terrorism, acts of nature, and premeditated political, economic, or military action.

—Analysis of possible supply disruption scenarios to include those that would be most stringent and those that are most probable; determination of the implications for supply disruptions of potential [Page 435] political discontinuities such as sudden changes of regime or government in important OPEC/OAPEC countries.

—Analysis of the probability and impact of sudden substantial petroleum price increases precipitated by OPEC/OAPEC action, both in times of normal supply conditions and in times of a supply interruption.

—Analysis of options available to the United States acting alone, and the United States in conjunction with its allies, to deter supply interruptions and substantial price increases, and cope with and overcome them should deterrence fail; determination of the optimal size, crude oil and refined product mix, and date of completion of reserve petroleum stocks in the United States and its allies; assessment of the credibility and deterrent value of various levels of petroleum reserves.

B. Military Contingency Analysis (Chaired by the Department of Defense)

—Analysis of the adequacy of petroleum resources to meet military and civilian needs of the United States and its allies under the most stringent and the most probable wartime scenarios; assessment of sce-narios short of war in which forces must be kept at high states of readiness due to increased threats.

—Analysis of the vulnerability of the world petroleum supply system to interdiction, including acts of terrorism, acts of nature, and premeditated political, economic, or military action.

—Identification of petroleum supply interruption scenarios which would significantly impair United States ability to execute existing military contingency plans.

—Analysis of United States military and related requirements for securing petroleum resources in each of the above scenarios; similar analysis with the addition of allied forces.

—Assessment of the existing and planned United States and allied military capabilities to meet requirements noted above.

—Identification and assessment of additional policies and options that would fulfill any requirements noted above which would be unmet due to inadequate existing or planned military capabilities.

C. Integrated Overview Report (National Security Council staff)

—Synthesis of the reports of the Departments of State and Defense into an integrated overview report to serve as the basis for review by the Special Coordination Committee.

—The integrated overview report should include:

—Identification of major issues.

—Identification of United States policy choices.

—Identification of topics requiring further analysis.

  1. Source: Carter Library, National Security Affairs, Staff Material, Middle East File, Box 65, Subject File, Oil. Confidential. The Department of Energy was established on August 4 when Carter signed the Department of Energy Organization Act. The Cabinet-level agency officially began to operate on October 1.
  2. On July 11, Bert Lance, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, sent Brzezinski a memorandum informing him that Carter had asked for the petroleum supply vulnerability assessment at a June 21 budget planning session. Lance requested that the National Security Council lead the effort and attached a paper listing the objectives and specific issues to be addressed by the assessment. (Ibid.)
  3. The SCC met to consider the assessment in March 1978. See Documents 144 and 145.