633.116/77

The Chargé in Uruguay (Reed) to the Secretary of State

No. 173

Sir: I have the honor to refer to my strictly confidential despatch No. 162 of February 4, 1938,53 in regard to the virtual prohibition of American imports resulting from the refusal to grant import permits for American goods, in which was reported an interview with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, in the course of which the Minister stated that the problem was on the point of being settled in accordance with the desires of the United States Government, and that the President had given instructions to the Minister of Finance to take measures to permit the resumption of importing from the United States.

No confirmation of these statements was received from the Minister of Foreign Affairs or noted from any action of the Exchange Control Authorities. In the course of a casual interview with the Vice President of the Bank of the Republic a few days later, that official informed me that he knew of no plan for permitting the resumption of importing from the United States. On February 9 there was received a note from the Ministry, transmitting an Aide-Mémoire in regard to the commerce between the United States and Uruguay (copy and translation attached). The note stated that, should the United States make additional purchases of Uruguayan goods at this time, it would be possible to apply 80% of the exchange created thereby towards the importation of American merchandise without considering the unfavorable balance of payments in 1937. The Aide-Mémoire contained a lengthy statement justifying the attitude and action of the Uruguayan Government. As this communication appeared to be at complete variance with the statements made to me by Dr. Espalter on February 3, I called at the Ministry of Foreign Relations during the weekly diplomatic audience today. I told the Minister that I had come to see him for the last time in my capacity as Chargé d’affaires, and we exchanged a few remarks about the approaching presentation of credentials by Minister Dawson.

I then asked him if there was any news in regard to the quota and trade situation. He inquired whether I had received any word directly from the Bank of the Republic, saying that the matter was one with which the Bank was principally concerned. I told him that I had not received any communication from the Bank, but that yesterday I had received a note signed by Señor Guillot,54 transmitting an Aide-Mémoire; that this Aide-Mémoire set forth the situation as it had been explained by the Minister of Finance and officials of the [Page 936] Bank of the Republic, but contained no solution of the present difficulties. I said I assumed that this note was the one to which he had referred in our interview of February 3rd, which amplified the Ministry’s note of January 27th, in reply to my Aide-Mémoire of January 19.55 He said that such was the case, and that the note had been prepared prior to our interview of February 3rd. He said that it presented the actual situation, but that, notwithstanding its terms, President Terra and the Government proposed to give special consideration to the interests of the United States. He continued that the method of solving the problem was under discussion between the Ministry of Finance and the Bank of the Republic, and that it was connected with the idea of obtaining credits from the United States to cover American imports into Uruguay. He said that of course foreign trade must be reciprocal, and repeated briefly some of the arguments used by the Minister of Finance in support of bilateral balances of trade, but modified these statements by the remark that special arrangements would be made for the United States.

I told him that I was naturally very anxious to learn further details of the projected arrangement for the relief of importers of American goods, and expressed the hope that as soon as the plan became somewhat more concrete this Legation would be informed. The Minister assured me that the Legation would be informed just as soon as a definite decision was taken, explaining that the discussion was still in progress.

The general situation has been slightly improved during the past ten days by the attitude of the exchange control authorities in granting a considerable number of import permits after receiving evidence that exchange to pay for the goods in question had been acquired in the free exchange market. This action was taken principally in connection with automobiles, agricultural machinery and electrical equipment, including refrigerators. However, the value of the Uruguayan peso fell about 15% in the free market, and the General Manager of the Bank of the Republic announced that in future the combined import quotas for goods paid for by free exchange from all countries would be limited to a total of £2,000 per day.

At present, therefore, there is no indication that a quota of official (controlled) exchange will be granted for American goods.

In view of the statements of the Minister of Foreign Affairs reported in my telegrams Nos. 7 of January 19, 1938, and 12 of February 3, 1938, I am inclined to feel that the Minister of Foreign Affairs, in spite of his desire to adjust the existing commercial difficulties with the United States, lacks sufficient influence in the Government to secure the adoption of the policy which he favors.

Respectfully yours,

Leslie E. Reed
[Page 937]
[Enclosure—Translation]

The Uruguayan Minister for Foreign Affairs (Espalter) to the American Chargé (Reed)

Mr. Chargé d’affaires: With reference to the note addressed to that Legation dated January 27th last, relative to the importation of goods from the United States of America, I am enclosing herewith an Aide-Mémoire containing information on the subject.

At the same time, I am pleased to express to you, Mr. Chargé d’Affaires, that this Government is inspired by the best intentions to satisfy the interests of the United States of America and believes that if this country (the United States) would make new purchases at the present time, it would be feasible to apply the largest part thereof to the importation of American goods in an important proportion of the amount thereof (80%), without considering the unfavorable balance of payments of 1937.

I avail myself [etc.]

For the Minister:
Luis Guillot

Director General
[Subenclosure—Translation]

The Uruguayan Ministry for Foreign Affairs to the American Legation

Aide-Mémoire

The Government of Uruguay has pursued an extremely benevolent policy with respect to the entry of merchandise of American origin, since it gave it a protection which may be summarized in the following points:

1)
It applied thereto the most-favored-nation treatment, on equal conditions.
2)
In order to permit the importation thereof in the most advantageous conditions, it granted to it advances of quotas during the year 1937.
3)
At the time when the scarcity of exchange was more acute, Uruguay permitted the entry of all agricultural machinery, implements, machinery in general and raw materials, all of them of North American origin, under the protection of controlled exchange, and in such volume, that it gave rise to a protest from the countries with which there were agreements and an available balance of exchange, on account of not having received a treatment equal to that of the United States.
4)
While with respect to other countries severe restrictive measures were applied to the extent of not permitting the entry of articles necessary to industry and commerce, Uruguay authorized the importation [Page 938] of automobiles which, although with free exchange, from the point of view of American interests, it (the free exchange) did not affect them whatever, since the sellers received in dollars the value of their shipments.

Uruguay is not to be blamed for the situation of its commerce with the United States, since a brief analysis of the figures of interchange will permit the confirmation of this assertion. In fact, the United States in the year 1936 made purchases of Uruguayan products in the amount of £2,700,000 while in the year 1937 such purchases only amounted to £990,000. Uruguay, on the contrary, intensified its acquisitions of American merchandise, since from £1,270,000 registered for the year 1936, it rose to £2,138,000 in the following year.

Uruguay found it necessary to adjust the importations from the United States after having exhausted all the exchange originating from its purchases, besides considerable quantities which belonged to other countries. The reason for the present unbalanced condition lies, as demonstrated by the foregoing figures, exclusively in the considerable decrease of purchases on the part of the United States, which was observed at the beginning of the year 1936, at which time it stopped to acquire wool, besides other items in less intensity.

On the other hand Uruguay has encouraged purchases in the United States, incorporating even automobiles and other articles of a sumptuary character within the quotas of controlled exchange.

The unbalanced condition is so pronounced that, notwithstanding the extraordinary quotas fixed by the Bank of the Republic, there remain in the Customhouse goods awaiting clearance amounting to considerable figures.

If the United States believes it is assisted by reason in claiming the entry of its merchandise notwithstanding the unbalanced condition of the balance of payments, Uruguay would be invested with the same rights to require that its products should be purchased in a proportion equal to the purchases it makes in the United States, a very just principle in commercial matters.

It may be pointed out that there is an error in the affirmation that no advance of exchange was made for extraordinary quotas until September 25, 1937, since previous to that date the unbalanced conditions existed and, without publicly expressing it, the Bank of the Republic fixed quotas on account of the exportations to be made to the United States, which supposition was not confirmed by events, since shipments suffered a vertical descent.

Uruguay finds itself in the practical possibility [impossibility?] of complying with the desires of the Chargé d’affaires of the United States to take care of the importations of that origin, since in order to do so it would have to utilize exchange produced by exportations [Page 939] to other countries, who, with more reason, would formulate their protest for the action of not permitting the importation of their goods to the effect of which they had provided the necessary foreign exchange, and which Uruguay would have unjustly diverted in the benefit of countries which purchased less.

This consideration amply justifies Uruguay’s conduct in the matter of importations from countries which have no exchange available in the interchange to form their quota. However, as stated before, the restrictions have been much less severe with the United States, since quotas have been recently fixed for the importation of automobiles, electrical refrigerators, vacuum cleaners, and many other articles which cannot be admitted as essential.

The policy of importations contemplated that they always originated from countries with a quota, and establishes the refusal or a negative resolution to the request, when the merchandise can be purchased in countries which have a quota available.

However, Uruguay is obliged to admit importations from countries without a quota, when such products are not susceptible of being brought from countries with a quota provided they are essential for industry, public consumption, or for the economic development of the nation.

We give below the figures of commercial interchange and financial movement up to December 1937.

Balance in favor of Uruguay from 1936 £784,752
Exports for the year 1937   993,311
£1,778,063
Exchange sold for imports £2,137,855   
Financial services 907,543.8.0 3,045,398.8.0
Exchange granted to the United States in excess. £1,267,335.8.0

Furthermore, the Honorary Commission of Imports and Exchange granted import permits with exchange not yet taken, in the approximate value of £100,000.

  1. Not printed.
  2. Luis Guillot, Director General of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
  3. See footnote 47, p. 927.