740.00119 PW/8–1745

Memorandum by Brigadier General George A. Lincoln of the War Department to the Assistant Secretary of State (Dunn)

General Hull9 has discussed the matter of a suitable reply to the Japanese on their latest message with the Chief of Staff10 and also with the Navy. They are in agreement that a suitable reply is substantially as that in the attached draft,11 which is the same as the one discussed yesterday in General Hull’s office. As discussed yesterday, the War and Navy Departments are agreed that requests of the kind in this Japanese message should hereafter be addressed to the Supreme Commander.

[Page 671]

For your information, there is enclosed a copy of General MacArthur’s message on the subject. You will note the extremely high classification of his message.

G. A. Lincoln
[Annex]
General of the Army Douglas MacArthur to the Chief of Staff (Marshall)

The Secret terms proposed by the Japanese are fundamentally violative of the provisions of the Potsdam Declaration and would completely traverse the previous attitude not only of the Allied Nations but of Japan herself in her initial successes and conquests of this war. The incidents of Bataan and Singapore are still fresh in the minds of the World. The enemy suggestion goes even to the point of preferential repatriative treatment of Japanese soldiers. The suggested ameliorations would relieve Japan of much of the physical and psychological burdens of defeat. I believe that public opinion throughout the Allied world would not support favorable consideration of these stipulations. In my opinion the Potsdam provisions should be put into effect as drawn and the suggestions made by the Japanese Government should be rejected. In China I believe the stipulations made by the Generalissimo as to the details of the surrender should be supported by the Allies.

  1. Lt. Gen. John E. Hull, Assistant Chief of Staff, Operations Division (OPD).
  2. General of the Army George C. Marshall.
  3. This draft was the same as the reply to the Japanese Government quoted in note of August 17 to the Swiss Chargé, p. 671.