794A. 5/12–850

Memorandum by Mr. Richard E. Johnson of the Office of Chinese Affairs to the Director of the Office of Chinese Affairs (Clubb)

top secret

Subject: Fox Survey Group Report

Attached is a paper summarizing the highlights of the Fox Report,1 section by section. This summary is believed useful in that it extracts from a mass of detail certain Survey Group conclusions which may be of interest to CA.

It is particularly interesting to note that the Group concludes (page 33) that the Chinese military establishment “although the product of expediency … is nonetheless also the product of and consistent with Chinese tradition and, accordingly, should be accepted as that most likely to satisfy the diverse tangible and intangible elements that comprise and motivate resistance to Communist aggression.”

This statement, and the Group’s failure to indicate that any changes in the Chinese command structure might be in order, are somewhat surprising in view of the generally adverse findings contained in the detailed discussion of the operating efficiency of the individual services. For example, the Survey Group failed to make the requested recommendations for additional aid to be furnished the Army and Air Force if the Seventh Fleet is removed, indicating that “limitations of personnel, training, etc.” would tender it impossible for these services to absorb the additional aid which would be required. The Air Force is said to be in a “very low” state of combat readiness, unprepared (in its present state) to provide adequate air defense even in conjunction with the Seventh Fleet, This deficiency is reportedly due in part to a lack of uniform training policies and tactical doctrine. The Navy, it is noted, has no plans for coordination of command, with individual ships apparently wandering about more or less independently. Navy training methods are said to be “generally deficient.” Although these deficiencies are noted, the Group’s report seems to conclude that the Chinese military organization should be “accepted” … as is.

It appears from my fairly hasty reading that the Survey Group’s report does not ignore any of the factors mentioned as relevant to military aid planning for China in our letter to Defense dated September 15:

(1)
It is expressly stated in the description of the Survey Group’s mission as well as in other parts of the report that aid is to be furnished for the defense of Taiwan. The Survey Group says it “studiously avoided” considering requirements for the defense of the Nationalist offshore islands, although it is pointed out that they are [Page 591] important as points of contact with the mainland and that the defense of Formosa is but a “means to an end”—the return to the mainland. The items listed in the “requirements” section (Appendix E) all seem (to my untutored eye) logical enough for defensive operations. The amphibious craft listed in the Chinese Navy’s request to General MacArthur are not included.
(2)
The report makes frequent reference to the limitations on the ability of the Chinese armed forces to “absorb” US aid, and states specifically that these limitations have been considered in drawing up the requirements of the individual services. As noted above, such limitations made it impossible for the Survey Group to recommend additional aid to be furnished if the Seventh Fleet were removed.
(3)
It is stated in the requirements section of the report that needs have been adjusted to reflect assets available through stocks on hand. The Nationalists are said to have “laid bare” their military establishment, willingly opening any warehouse, arsenal, etc., without forewarning for inspection by Survey Group members. The Nationalists’ production capabilities have also been taken into consideration in determining requirements (Annex G).
(4)
The Survey Group’s list of requirments is not limited primarily to “spare parts, ammunition, and maintenance equipment or services”, as suggested in our letter of September 15. There are many items of new material and equipment, including approximately 27,000 rifles, 22,000 carbines, 8,000 trucks, 110 medium tanks, 220 fighter aircraft, and a wide variety of new radio equipment. However, under the circumstances I don’t suppose the Department is in a position to attack the inclusion of these individual items—described by the Fox Group as “essential” to the defense of Taiwan (with Seventh Fleet support). And if our grant aid program is to be based on the Fox Survey Group’s findings, it would be difficult for the Department to find a basis for attacking the overall figure of $158.2 million unless we have specific deletions in mind. In any event, I believe we can withhold comment until we have seen Defense’s recommendations regarding grant military aid, which, I understand, will total considerably more, viz: $212 million.

[Annex]

Memorandum by Mr. Richard E. Johnson of the Office of Chinese Affairs

top secret

Highlights of Report of Far East Command Survey Group to Formosa Dated September 11, 1950

i. mission

The Survey Group had a two-fold mission. Its instructions were to make recommendations regarding the need of military assistance to enable the Chinese Nationalist Forces to prevent the capture of Formosa by the Communists, both (1) with and (2) without the Seventh [Page 592] Fleet. However, the Group largely ignored the second phase of its assignment. In the case of the Chinese Army and Air Force, it is stated that the requirements developed on the assumption of Seventh Fleet assistance were “the maximum within the limitations of personnel, training, etc”. In other words, the Survey Group appears to believe that the Chinese Army and Air Force are incapable of absorbing sufficient military assistance to defend the Island without the Seventh Fleet, and requirements listed for Army and Air Force are based on the single assumption of continued Seventh Fleet protection. Chinese Navy requirements are shown under both assumptions, with the recommendation that 54 escort vessels and patrol craft be furnished if the Seventh Fleet is removed. Here too, however, the Survey Group appears to have doubts regarding “ability to absorb” sufficient units to defend the Island alone.

ii. scope, character and conduct of survey

Since its instructions were to survey requirements for the defense of Formosa and the Pescadores, the Survey Group “studiously avoided” any consideration of the Nationalists’ off-shore islands. However, in stressing the importance of these islands as points of contact with the mainland, the report emphasized that “the Nationalists’ will to fight is directly proportional to their hope of return to the Asiatic mainland,” and that the defense of Formosa is merely a “means to an end”.

The Survey Group reports that the Nationalists “laid bare” their military establishment, willing to open any installations and answer any questions with no forewarning. Their eagerness to cooperate is termed “astounding”.

iii. discussion of factors bearing on the problem

Surveying enemy capabilities, the report states that it is considered doubtful that the Communists will attempt to launch an amphibious assault against Formosa and/or the Pescadores “in the near future” unless substantial Soviet air and naval forces are made available. The continued occupation of Kinmen and Little Kinmen Islands by the Nationalists hampers Communist egress for a Formosa assault and poses a threat to the mainland. Nationalist garrisons at Ma-tsu and Ta-Chen Islands are of less tactical value, but serve as outposts for contact with guerrillas and for the collection of intelligence. It is estimated that the Communists will attempt to eliminate the Nationalist outposts, especially Kinmen and Little Kinmen, before launching an amphibious assault against Formosa and/or the Pescadores. After examining various geographical factors, the Survey Group concludes that the most likely points for Communist landings on Formosa are between Hsinchu and Tansui in the north and between [Page 593] Tainan and Fangliao in the south. It is estimated that 19 divisions would be employed in the initial landings.

There follows a discussion of the structure of the Ministry of National Defense, the Supreme General Staff, and the four departments of the MND: (Army, Navy, Air Force, and Combined Service Forces), reaching the conclusion that the command structure of MND “appears to be sound”, although it has not been battle-tested.

Army

The Chinese ground forces are characterized as an “important deterrent” to the Communist invasion of Formosa. The armored brigade is stated to be the most effective organization of the ground forces “in view of its counterattack potential”. Although training is sound and morale appears to be good, infantry divisions are hampered by a lack of automatic weapons and by the wide variety of arms on hand which complicates re-supply of ammunition and spare parts. Effective anti-tank defense appears to be lacking and radio communications are generally inadequate. The Army organization that has been established “is the product of an attempt to reconcile available means with the situation posed not only by the potential enemy but by many interior political and psychological factors”. The Survey Group concludes that “units as now disposed will be capable of containing and expelling Communist landings on Formosa if provided with the material aid and personnel assistance recommended elsewhere in this report” (NB: report contains no detailed listing of “personnel” assistance required). This conclusion is presumably reached on the assumption of continued Seventh Fleet protection.

Navy

The Survey Group’s comments regarding the Nationalist Navy are far from complimentary. The report states that the Chinese Navy has done little toward the preparation of war or operational plans, with ships generally operating independently and with no specific plans for coordination of command. Of the 41,000 officers and enlisted men in the Chinese Navy, only 15,000 are eligible for sea service. Manpower suitable for naval training is said to be limited and training methods are generally deficient. The report estimates that the Navy would require “many times its present number of ships” to carry out its mission of destroying an enemy armada without Seventh Fleet assistance, but indicates that the Navy is unable to expand sufficiently to absorb these additional fleet units. With the Seventh Fleet present, the Chinese Navy could be used for inshore patrol, dealing with any ships which might get by US units. In this case, it is estimated that the maintenance of operability of presently available Chinese ships is the only requirement. This would involve the furnishing of ammunition, [Page 594] fuel, and certain critical ordnance, electronic, and diesel spare parts, but no new vessels.

Air Force

The Survey Group also describes the Chinese Air Force in unflattering terms. Although Air Force training concepts appear to be sound, the general state of combat readiness is rated “very low”. This is due to (1) limited training, owing to the lack of aircraft spares and other supplies, and (2) lack of uniform directives to cover training and tactical doctrine. While morale appears to be good, virtually all pilots lack proficiency in most technical phases of flying, such as instruments, gunnery and bombing. In its present status, the Air Force is not considered to be prepared, either alone or in conjunction with the Seventh Fleet, to provide adequate air defense for Formosa and the Pescadores. However, the Air Force does have the organizational structure and the necessary personnel to absorb and utilize the additional equipment (including 220 fighter-type aircraft) necessary to make it an effective force for the defense of Formosa, “within a reasonable period of time”.

Combined Service Forces

It is interesting to note that in its treatment of CSF procurement procedures, the report makes no mention whatsoever of the role of Commerce International (China).

iv. requirements

Requirements (listed in detail in Annex E) are said to represent “minimum essential needs, considering limitations of trained personnel for operation and maintenance, terrain, facilities, etc.,” adjusted to reflect assets available through stocks on hand as well as local production. It is conceded that “in many cases” requirements recommended by the Survey Group exceed those estimated by the Chinese Government itself.

v. conclusions

“Although the product of expediency, the current organization of the Chinese Armed Forces is nonetheless also the product of and consistent with Chinese tradition, and accordingly, should be accepted as that most likely to satisfy the diverse tangible and intangible elements that comprise and motivate resistance to Communist aggression and should be used as a basis for computing aid requirements. There exist today, within the Chinese Military Establishment, certain major shortages, primarily in automatic weapons, artillery, tanks, fighter aircraft, combatant vessels, motor transportation, signal communications and ammunition, that seriously endanger the defense of Formosa. Various stocks must be built up to an operating level if the [Page 595] Chinese Nationalist forces are to be expected to repel a determined invader. As equipment and matériel are provided to the Chinese, United States technical assistance will be needed. Many additional combatant ships would be required for satisfactory defense of Formosa by Chinese Nationalist forces alone. However, the Chinese Navy, through shortage of trained personnel, is severely limited in its ability to absorb additional units. Should the Chinese Communist Forces launch an all-out amphibious operation against Formosa and the Pescadores, using 19 divisions in the initial lift, the intervention of the Seventh Fleet would seriously cripple the invading fleet but it probably could not prevent a considerable number of Communist troops from getting ashore. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the Seventh Fleet in this operation would be reduced proportionately should it have other commitments at the critical period. On the other hand, the current Chinese Navy, operating alone, would be practically impotent against such an offensive. In either case, a maximum effort on the part of the Chinese Air and Ground Forces would be required to expel the invaders. There can be no significant increase or decrease envisaged in the military manpower available to the Chinese Nationalists on Formosa nor can any significant redistribution among the four services be anticipated. Given material and moral aid, the probability of a successful defense of Formosa by the Chinese Nationalists will be greatly enhanced.”

vi. recommendations

“It is recommended that the attached list of major items (Annex E) and all supporting accessory equipment, maintenance tools and spare parts for ninety days maintenance be furnished to the Republic of China with the least practicable delay. It is further recommended that appropriate United States technical assistance be provided as required by the Chinese Nationalists. [”]

vii. annexes

A, B & C:—Detailed review of organization, personnel, training, equipment, etc. of Army, Navy and Air Force.

D. G–2 Estimate of Situation:

This section includes an analysis of Communist troop deployment and capabilities (most of which has become obsolete in the three months since the report was published) and an estimate of the probable nature of a Chinese Communist operation against Formosa and/or the Pescadores (summarized under Part II above).

E. Items required by the Chinese Nationalist Forces

This annex is divided into two sections. Part I, indicates Army, Navy, and Air Force requirements for the defense of Taiwan with Seventh Fleet support, and includes a wide variety of ammunition, [Page 596] weapons, vehicles, tanks, aircraft, radio equipment, and quartermaster, engineer and medical supplies, as well as petroleum requirements for thirty days combat operations. Part II indicates requirements (Navy only) for the defense of Taiwan without Seventh Fleet support, including 4 destroyer escorts, 20 patrol craft, 20 small personnel landing craft and 10 26-ft. motor launches, together with necessary ammunition, weapons, parts, accessories and petroleum.

Note—The Survey Group did not price these estimated requirements, but they have since been priced in the Pentagon as follows (in millions):

Part I Army Navy Air Force Total
Maintenance and Replacement $ 3.0 $10.0 $26.4 $39.4
New Equipment 55.0 _____ 41.8 96.8
Packing, Handling and Transportation 8.0 2.0 12.0 22.0
$66.0 $12.0 $80.2 $158.2

Part II (additional ships to be furnished if Seventh Fleet is withdrawn): $100 million

F. General Plan of Combined Operations by (Chinese) Army, Navy and Air Force for the Defense of Taiwan (furnished by the Chinese MND and reproduced without change):

Purpose—In order to annihilate the invading enemy, to hold Taiwan, and to prepare for a counter-offensive on the mainland, the air force will seek to attack the enemy air and naval forces and its ship installations; and the navy will carry out repeated attacks on the ships along the coast line of the mainland, so that the enemy’s preparation for a landing operation may be destroyed. In case that the enemy commences his voyage for an invasion of Taiwan, the ground force will concentrate rapidly its superior mobile troops, supported by air and naval forces, to launch severe and determined attacks simultaneously on many fronts so as to destroy the enemy during its initial landing. After the landing enemy is destroyed, some of the points along the coast line of the mainland will be selected as limited objectives for a pursuit landing and the remnants of ships and ship installations will be wiped out so as to dismantle its ability of resuming any offensive.”

Note: This statement appears to contradict unevaluated information previously received indicating that MND did not plan to defend the beaches, but would launch its counterattack well inland.

G. Indicated Production Capabilities of Formosa.

[Mr. Johnson’s memorandum ended here. There were no comments listed under heading “G”.]

  1. The “Fox Report” is not printed.