795.00/7–2153: Telegram

The Secretary of State to the Embassy in Korea1

secret
niact

50. Reference your conversation with Paek and Pyun (your 462) deliver soonest personally to Rhee following personal message from the Secretary and Robertson:

  • “1. Harrison was speaking on behalf of the United Nations Military Command making an armistice. He did not undertake to make political commitments binding governments and his remarks should not be construed in that sense. As the UN military commander in the field signing an armistice, CINCUNC has a duty to try to live up to the armistice. Obviously, no military officer in the field can bind the United States as [Page 1408] to policy for an indefinite period of time. Notably, he has no power to make what is in effect a treaty which would preclude Congress from exercising its constitutional power to declare war. The U.S. Government’s commitment with reference to the political conference and consultation stands. Of course, the United States is bound by the provisions of the United Nations Charter with particular reference to Article 2 and the fact that it cannot make war except through its constitutional processes.
  • 2. The Planning Board of the NSC has completed its study of the Tasca report and it is expected to receive the approval of the NSC in the next few days, and the President will request necessary legislation for its implementation from this session of the Congress. This envisages greatly increased expenditures for economic assistance to Korea following an armistice. It contemplates a program of approximately $1 billion over a four- or five-year period not including payments to the ROK for military local currency requirements or the costs of military civil construction. It also contemplates an enlargement of the program if a unified Korea is achieved.
  • 3. With reference to the treaty, Robertson has fully discussed this with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. His impression is that it will be necessary to adhere rather closely to the draft previously discussed with Senate leaders and submitted to Rhee on July 4, although some modifications of language such as inclusion of an article along the line of Article 1 of the Japanese Treaty can be considered. We are prepared to begin promptly negotiation of the treaty and we would expect to invite to the negotiations two Senators—for example, H. Alexander Smith and John Sparkman, both of whom are sympathetic to a strong anti-Communist position in Asia.
  • 4. In line with Robertson’s suggestion, Secretary Dulles is prepared, promptly upon conclusion of the armistice and preferably prior to any United Nations Assembly to meet with President Rhee to decide on the policy and tactics to be pursued jointly by our governments at the political conference. Secretary suggests intermediate point so as to avoid complications in relation to Formosa and Japan, which places he is committed visit on his next trip to Orient. He cannot combine those visits with this trip as purpose is to have quick exchange of views with President Rhee and then get back in time to present agreed program to UN Assembly which will be convening.”

Dulles
  1. This telegram, drafted by Dulles and cleared by Johnson, was repeated to Pusan as telegram 59 and to Tokyo for Clark as 189.
  2. Dated July 21, p. 1404.