The assessment was prepared in collaboration with the Commander-in-Chief,
Pacific (CINCPAC); the Joint United
States Public Affairs Office (JUSPAO),
Saigon; and the Military Assistance Command, Viet-Nam (MACV). It was coordinated with the Department
of Defense, which is submitting a separate but similar document.3
Because he is out of the country, Mr. Shakespeare has not read the assessment.
Attachment
Assessment Prepared in the United States Information
Agency5
Washington, January 1970
[Omitted here are the title page and the table of contents.]
SUMMARY
The Chieu Hoi (Open Arms)
inducement campaign has been a solid success in 1969, producing over
47,000 defectors. The ralliers have provided crucial intelligence and
other aid to Free World Forces, and these defections are a major concern
to the Communist leadership. Yet the inducement campaign to defect,
surrender, or desert, while singularly effective against Viet Cong
(Southerners), has had little effect against the North Vietnamese Army
(NVA).
The leaflet campaigns along the Lao trail and border areas of Cambodia
appear to be very useful. But the Cambodia effort lacks continuity
because of recurrent unfavorable wind conditions and Sihanouk’s prohibition against
overflight. Reward programs for delivering enemy weapons have been
partially successful. Efforts to play on North-South regional prejudices
in enemy ranks have been cautious, subtle and almost exclusively
covert.
Now that enemy forces are predominantly North Vietnamese, two appeals are
becoming stale: (1) the appeal to rally seldom affects North Vietnamese
soldiers because their relatives are in the North, not the South; and
(2) the appeal to surrender under slackening battle situations is not
compelling, as the NVA often retreats
to sanctuaries. Therefore, it would appear necessary to expand and
sharpen communication with Communist forces, particularly NVA, in sanctuaries or on the trail, where
war-weariness and opportunity for reflection can be exploited.
For the past fifteen months, there has been no overt program directed
specifically at North Vietnam. This is the largest gap in GVN–US
PSYOP in Vietnam. The only means of addressing North Vietnamese targets
is via radio. The Voice of America (VOA) can be heard in NVN by
very limited but important audiences 10 hours daily, but its message is
directed to all Vietnamese, and often in the Southern dialect. We have
some indications that information received from VOA and the BBC is
circulated orally in North Vietnam.
[Page 145]
An intensive and extensive all-media campaign, based on political,
military, economic, and social progress in South Vietnam, continues with
growing success to foster mutual support between the GVN and the SVN populace.
With the above developing situation, 1970 programs should serve three
major purposes: (1) weaken the resolve of enemy forces, especially the
NVA; (2) mobilize politically the
population in South Vietnam; and (3) open additional communication with
the North Vietnamese people.
Specific suggestions for improving our PSYOP include: (1) in inducement
programs, increase the proportion of desert/fade-away appeals, (2) in
output to NVA and NVN, stress the availability of peace on
honorable terms, (3) expand air-drops over Cambodia, (4) increase
air-drops over Laos, and (5) start overt broadcasts specifically to
NVN.
With regard to Vietnamization, both the joint US Public Affairs Office (JUSPAO) and the US Military
Assistance Command (MACV) are
beginning to devolve most of the total PSYOP effort on the GVN’s Ministry of Information (MOI) and RVNAF’s General Political Warfare
Department (GPWD). JUSPAO has
established some tentative dates for MOI’s assumption of responsibility for segments of media
operations, and MACV is staffing a
plan for the turnover of military PSYOP assets to RVNAF.
Major problems of Vietnamization are: (1) deficient GVN interest in PSYOP, (2) lack of
continuity of MOI leadership, (3) a
plethora of GVN PSYOP agencies, and
lack of coordination, (4) the GVN’s
difficulty in training and retaining qualified personnel, (5) possible
misuse of information personnel for President Thieu’s personal benefit,
(6) the scarcity of official printing establishments, (7) poor
distribution of MOI funds to provincial
offices, and (8) potential neglect of PSYOP against the enemy, owing to
Vietnamese military PSYOP priorities.
[Omitted here are sections I. Appraisal; II. Improvement of Psyop
Programs Against the Enemy; and III. Impact of Vietnamization on Psyop
Programs.]